![]() The document also revealed that Steele’s primary sub-source “disagreed with and was surprised by” how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the dossier.įor instance, the source told the FBI he “did not recall” where some of the information attributed to him or his sources came from was never told about or mentioned to Steele certain information attributed to him or his sources said that Steele “re-characterized” some of the information to make it more substantiated and “less attenuated” than it really was and that he would have described some of his sources differently. Moreover, the document demonstrated that the information Steele’s primary sub-source provided him was “second and third-hand information and rumors at best.” The document revealed that the primary “source” of Steele’s election reporting was not a current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian-based contract employee of Steele’s firm, according to the committee. The document revealed that the dossier was “unsubstantiated and unreliable,” according to sources who reviewed it, and showed that the FBI was on notice of the dossier’s credibility problems, yet continued to seek further FISA warrant renewals for Page. The source, according to the committee, told the FBI in interviews in January and March of 2017 that the information contained in the anti-Trump dossier was unreliable. Steele authored the unverified anti-Trump dossier of claims about alleged ties between Donald Trump and Russia that served as the basis for FISA warrants obtained against Page. The first document, which the committee said spanned 57 pages, is a summary of a three-day interview with ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source. UPDATE (July 21 2020) - Newly declassified documents that they say “significantly undercut” the “reliability” of the infamous Steele dossier from the Russia probe, as well as the accuracy and reliability of the factual assertions in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. RELATED POST: Seymour Hersh: “Russia Election Hack is a CIA Hoax” RELATED POST: Bob Woodward: Trump Dossier Is a ‘Garbage Document’ - “Intelligence Chiefs Should ‘Apologize’ to Trump” RELATED POST: Two Years Ago - From Watergate to… GoldenGate? RELATED POST: Fake News: FBI and DHS release ‘evidence’ of Russia Interference RELATED POST: CIA Accusations are Unproven, Dangerous and Beyond Hypocrisy RELATED POST: Intel Report Suspiciously Anachronistic Needs to be investigated.”Īp“Watergate” journalist Bob Woodward told this week’s edition of “Fox News Sunday” that the role the Steele dossier played in the origin of the Trump-Russia investigation is “highly questionable” and “needs to be investigated.” Follow us on Twitter: POST: Two Years Ago - The Trump Dossier : Raw Intelligence or Clever Fabrication? - POLL But in this process, the idea that they would include something like that in one of the great stellar intelligence assessments as Mueller also found out is highly questionable. “I think it was the CIA pushing this, real intelligence experts looked at this and said no, this is not intelligence, this is garbage and they took it out. That is my assertion, indeed my assertion under oath.” Lawyer Hugh Tomlinson: “But none of these documents exist, so they have all been destroyed?”Ĭhristopher Steele :“They no longer exist. ![]() The Primary Sub-Source’s debriefings by Orbis were meticulously documented and recorded.”Ĭounsel for Christopher Steele and Orbis Business Intelligence (December 10 2019) “Had Orbis been given the opportunity to respond in a private session, the statements by the Primary Sub-Source would be put in a different light. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |